CUT IR

Adaptive co-management, co-existence or just wildlife conservation? Case study of the human and Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) conflicts in Ngezi Dam, Mashonaland West, Zimbabwe

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chakanyuka, Tafadzwa
dc.contributor.author Utete, Beaven
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-05T12:21:19Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-05T12:21:19Z
dc.date.issued 2021-02-17
dc.identifier.citation Chakanyuka, T., & Utete, B. (2022). Adaptive co‐management, co‐existence or just wildlife conservation? Case study of the human and Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) conflicts in Ngezi Dam, Mashonaland West, Zimbabwe. African Journal of Ecology, 60(3), 759-768. en_US
dc.identifier.issn DOI: 10.1111/aje.12974
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.cut.ac.zw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/543
dc.description.abstract Increased human–wildlife conflicts in shared and partially closed conservation areas encompassing terrestrial and aquatic systems such as Ngezi Dam in Zimbabwe may arise from competing uses. This case study aimed to (i) estimate the abundance and distribution of Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus), (ii) identify potential human–crocodile conflict hotspots, (iii) assess the perceptions and attitudes of Ngezi Dam side communities towards crocodiles and their effects on rural livelihoods and (iv) examine the application of co-existence and adaptive co-management concepts in human–crocodile conflict resolution. A mixed-methods research approach integrating field surveys, focus group discussions and face-to- face interviews was used to collect data on crocodiles and human communities. A total of 54 and 57 Nile crocodiles were observed in 2017 and 2018, respectively, with no significant spatiotemporal differences (p > 0.05) in crocodile abundances. Crocodile hotspots (Getis-Ord >1.96) detected round the dam indicated potential human–crocodile- livestock conflicts. Most respondents (76%) showed a negative attitude towards crocodiles, which they indicated destroy livelihoods through injury, death and livestock depredation. The lopsided losses, for example human injuries and fatalities, loss of fishing equipment and livestock in human–crocodile conflicts drawn from this case study reflected a need to delicately recalibrate the contextualised optimisation and balanced implementation of conservation, co-management and human needs in shared landscapes. Astute crocodile conservation whilst offsetting human needs requires an inductive rather than deductive perspective lens. We propose a human–crocodile conflict contextual resolution framework (HCCCR), which prioritises interactive adaptive co-management in a specific context in shared conservation landscapes. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley Online Library en_US
dc.subject adaptive management en_US
dc.subject boundary spanning reserves en_US
dc.subject conservation en_US
dc.subject human-crocodile conflict en_US
dc.subject Nile crocodile en_US
dc.title Adaptive co-management, co-existence or just wildlife conservation? Case study of the human and Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) conflicts in Ngezi Dam, Mashonaland West, Zimbabwe en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CUT IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account