CUT IR

Community perceptions of wildlife conservation and tourism: A case study of communities adjacent to four protected areas in Zimbabwe

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mutanga, Chiedza Ngonidzashe
dc.contributor.author Vengesayi, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author Gandiwa, Edson
dc.contributor.author Muboko, Never
dc.date.accessioned 2024-11-27T14:05:21Z
dc.date.available 2024-11-27T14:05:21Z
dc.date.issued 2015-06-29
dc.identifier.citation Ngonidzashe Mutanga, C., Vengesayi, S., Gandiwa, E., & Muboko, N. (2015). Community perceptions of wildlife conservation and tourism: A case study of communities adjacent to four protected areas in Zimbabwe. Tropical Conservation Science, 8(2), 564-582. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1940-0829
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.cut.ac.zw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/468
dc.description.abstract The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine community perceptions of wildlife conservation and tourism, and (2) to establish socio-demographic factors that influence community perceptions of wildlife conservation and tourism. Using closed-ended questionnaires, we collected data from July 2013 to February 2014 in four protected areas (PAs) and adjacent communities in Zimbabwe, i.e., Umfurudzi Park, Gonarezhou National Park, Matusadona National Park and Cawston Ranch. A total of 938 responded to the survey. The community in Gonarezhou had neutral perceptions of wildlife conservation, while those in Umfurudzi, Matusadona, and Cawston Ranch had positive perceptions of wildlife conservation. All four communities had negative perceptions of tourism.There were variable correlations between socio-demographic factors and community perceptions of wildlife conserve ation and tourism among the different study communities. We concluded that the PAs in question have not fully involved the communities in PA management and that benefits from natural resources are not fairly shared among stakeholders, as explained by the different perceptions communities had on wildlife conservation and tourism. We recommend that conservation agencies should: (i) nurture positive perceptions and address the possible determinants of negative perceptions by the communities, (ii) enhance community involvement and benefits from tourism, and (iii) consider community heterogeneity in conservation planning. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Tropical Conservation Science en_US
dc.subject conservation en_US
dc.subject community heterogeneity en_US
dc.subject perceptions en_US
dc.subject socio-demographic factors en_US
dc.subject tourism en_US
dc.title Community perceptions of wildlife conservation and tourism: A case study of communities adjacent to four protected areas in Zimbabwe en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CUT IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account